Chipstrat

Chipstrat

Share this post

Chipstrat
Chipstrat
Groq's Business Model, Part 3: Competing with Google, AWS, Microsoft
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Groq's Business Model, Part 3: Competing with Google, AWS, Microsoft

Advantages and Disadvantages of Competing Against The Big Dogs

Austin Lyons's avatar
Austin Lyons
Oct 25, 2024
∙ Paid

Share this post

Chipstrat
Chipstrat
Groq's Business Model, Part 3: Competing with Google, AWS, Microsoft
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

Groq is traditionally considered an Nvidia competitor but also competes against cloud service providers (CSPs) like Google, AWS, and Microsoft. Let’s study how Groq’s inference API and hardware leasing offerings compete.

Context

In Part 2 of Groq’s Business Model, we explored how Groq utilizes its inventory to power a tokens-as-a-service offering. Moreover, Groq can lease underutilized inventory and provide colocation services in its data center facilities, creating a recurring revenue stream. Finally, Groq still conducts traditional hardware sales, for example, by selling racks of LPUs for data centers in Norway and Saudi Arabia. 

A mental model for these revenue streams is a “ramp to hardware”:

Groq’s offerings progressively address more of the customer journey; consuming an inference API is much less burdensome than buying servers. 

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Austin Lyons
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More